Case Study: Custom Shorts Softball Wear for a Government Agency in Australia
Source:Shorts Softball Wear /
Time:2026-09-18
Shorts Softball Wear for a Government Agency in Australia
A Government Agency approached us with a shorts softball wear requirement for Australia. The brief was specific: a defined look, a hard launch date and a unit cost that had to survive shipping and duty. This case study records what was specified, what went wrong in sampling and how the bulk order was delivered.
The challenge
- Unclear responsibility when a defect shows up after washing
- Suppliers who disappear once the deposit is paid
- Inconsistent sizing between production runs
What we specified
| Product | Shorts Softball Wear |
|---|---|
| Client type | A Government Agency |
| Market | Australia |
| Order volume | 500 pieces across 4 colourways |
| Base fabric | Faux Shearling |
| Decoration | Heat Transfer Printing |
| Size range | XS-3XL |
| Sampling rounds | 2 |
| Delivery window | 8 weeks from PO to ex-factory |
How it was resolved
- We rebuilt the tech pack around Faux Shearling and locked shrinkage allowance before grading.
- Decoration was moved to Heat Transfer Printing after strike-off tests showed better wash durability.
- A pre-production sample was approved and retained as the golden reference.
- Production ran with in-line inspection and a mid-run photo report.
- Cartons were packed to the client's own barcode and size ratio specification.
Result
- 500 pieces delivered inside the 8-week window.
- Unit cost held within 1.5% of the original quotation.
- Return rate linked to fit or workmanship stayed under 2.0%.
- The specification is now on file, so reorders reproduce the approved sample.
What we would repeat
Lock the colour standard before grading. Once a shade moves, every downstream approval has to be redone and the calendar slips.
Planning something similar?
Book a 20-minute call with our merchandising team and get a written quotation within 48 hours.
